http://www.revisemri.com/blog/2006/html-or-xhtml/ For your short relaxation times. Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:26:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.revisemri.com/blog/2006/html-or-xhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-71551 Brandie Mon, 27 Jun 2011 05:35:37 +0000 http://www.revisemri.com/blog/2006/html-or-xhtml/#comment-71551 This makes everything so completely pilaenss. This makes everything so completely pilaenss.

]]> http://www.revisemri.com/blog/2006/html-or-xhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-8798 Dave Higgins Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:53:56 +0000 http://www.revisemri.com/blog/2006/html-or-xhtml/#comment-8798 <p>The straw which breaks the camel's back about XHTML served with the proper MIME type, is that search engine bots - including the Googlebot - do not recognise it. Use it and none of your pages will get indexed.</p> The straw which breaks the camel’s back about XHTML served with the proper MIME type, is that search engine bots – including the Googlebot – do not recognise it. Use it and none of your pages will get indexed.

]]> http://www.revisemri.com/blog/2006/html-or-xhtml/comment-page-1/#comment-494 Web Masters Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:11:23 +0000 http://www.revisemri.com/blog/2006/html-or-xhtml/#comment-494 Hi, my site is www .innovateidea.com in xhtml1.1 & 1.0, I have all my pages valid according to the w3 standards, but why is that w3.org itself has few invalid pages, over 10 pages. Hi, my site is www .innovateidea.com in xhtml1.1 & 1.0, I have all my pages valid according to the w3 standards, but why is that w3.org itself has few invalid pages, over 10 pages.

]]>